Skip to content

NZDF aptitude questions: one worked example per reasoning type

3 min read ยท Updated 22 August 2026

Inductive reasoning asks you to find the rule that generates a pattern; deductive reasoning asks you to apply a rule that has already been stated. NZDF aptitude testing uses both, alongside numerical ability and mechanical reasoning. Here is one worked example of each.

A numerical ability example

A vehicle uses 8.4 litres per 100 km. How much fuel is needed for a 350 km move?

The method: set the relationship up before calculating. 8.4 litres per 100 km means 0.084 litres per km, so 350 km needs 29.4 litres. The common error is dividing when you should multiply, which an estimate catches instantly: 350 km is three and a half hundreds, so the answer must be around three and a half times 8.4.

Estimate first, calculate second. It eliminates wrong options faster than arithmetic does.

An inductive reasoning example

A sequence of tiles: each has a number of dots and a shape that rotates. What comes next?

The method: check one attribute at a time across the entire sequence. Count the dots first and write the numbers down. Then track rotation separately. Then shading. Two simple rules running in parallel look like one impossible rule if you try to see them at once, that is the whole difficulty of inductive items.

A deductive reasoning example

All members of the section carry a radio. Some members of the section are trained in first aid. Does it follow that some radio carriers are trained in first aid?

Yes, and the reason is worth being precise about. Every section member carries a radio, so the first-aid-trained members are among the radio carriers. The method: work only from what is stated. Deductive items are almost always failed by importing a real-world assumption the question did not give you.

A mechanical reasoning example

Two gears mesh directly. The first turns clockwise. Which way does the second turn?

Anticlockwise: directly meshed gears turn in opposite directions. In a train of three, the first and third turn the same way.

The method: learn the handful of principles that generate most mechanical items: meshed gears reverse, larger driven gears turn slower with more torque, more supporting rope sections mean less force in a pulley system, and a longer lever arm means less effort. Most questions are one of those in a new costume.

What is the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning?

InductiveDeductive
You are givenExamplesA rule
You must findThe ruleWhat follows from it
Typical failureTrying to see all attributes at onceAdding an assumption not stated

How should you practise each area?

Untimed method work first, then time pressure. Trying to get fast before you are consistent just entrenches whichever approach you happened to start with. Background on how the whole assessment fits together is in the NZDF aptitude test guide.

Frequently asked questions

Are these real NZDF test questions?

No. They are original Asessly questions written to practise the same reasoning areas NZDF publicly describes.

What is inductive reasoning?

Working from examples to the rule. You are shown a pattern and must infer what governs it: nothing states the rule for you.

What is mechanical reasoning?

Predicting how physical systems behave: gears, levers, pulleys, pressure and forces. A small number of principles generate most questions.

How many questions are on the NZDF aptitude test?

Assessment structure is set by NZDF and can change. Confirm current details with a recruiter rather than a third-party page.

Which area is hardest?

It varies by background. Applicants without hands-on experience of machinery most often find mechanical reasoning hardest; those out of study longest often find inductive sequences hardest.

Can you use a calculator?

Assessment conditions are set by NZDF. Check the instructions given with your testing.

Sources

Requirements and fees change. Confirm current details with the responsible organisation before you rely on them.